Application seeking rectification of a prior court order in which the word 'petitioner' was inadvertently used instead of 'respondent'. The court rectified the order and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
SANJEEV SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Mushan Tyagi, Advocate.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHITHROUGH SHO PS DWARKA NORTH ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate for Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for State with SI Manisha Yadav, P.S. Dwarka North, Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 16.02.2024
CRL.M.A. 5042/2024 (for rectification of order dated 16.01.2024)
“1. Learned ASC appearing on behalf of State, on instructions states that the charge-sheet will be filed within one
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2024 at 11:35:53
month under intimation to the complainant/ petitioner herein.”
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2024/ hs
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2024 at 11:35:53
Sanjeev Sharma
State NCT of Delhi through SHO PS Dwarka North
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
