State v. Anish
Case brief
What is this about?
State's criminal leave petition challenging acquittal for stalking and criminal intimidation. Court found no particulars of stalking incidents, child intermediary not examined, and no evidence of the mobile number slip; ingredients of Section 354D IPC not made out. Petition dismissed, upholding acquittal.
What the court decided
$~12
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
- % Date of Decision: 04.01.2024
- CRL.L.P. 305/2022, CRL.M.A. 12674/2022
STATE ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Aarti, PS: Bhalswa Dairy.
versus
ANISH ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Bali and Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
% J U D G M E N T
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the acquittal under Sections 354D/506/34 IPC was justified given inconsistencies in witness statements and lack of evidence of stalking.
Whether leave to appeal against acquittal should be granted to the State.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State
- respondent
Anish
Coram
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court