had also filed a maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad, UP and vide order dated 08.07.2019, the learned Family Court, Allahabad granted maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month in favour of the respondent and maintenance paid to the respondent in any other proceeding was to be adjusted in this amount. A perusal of this order would show that the Court was cognizant of the fact of the respondent receiving maintenance in lieu of the consent order passed in the HMA proceedings and took it into account while computing the aforesaid amount. The petitioner had challenged the said order in a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court which vide order dated 19.10.2019 stayed the operation of the abovementioned order, subject to payment of Rs 2,000 by the petitioner to the respondent. The said revision is still pending. Thereafter, the respondent filed a complaint under Section 12 of the PWDV Act, 2005 against the petitioner and his mother before the Court of Ld. MM, Mahila Courts, Distt. West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in which she also filed an application under Section 23 of the PWDV Act, 2005 for grant of interim relief. The application for maintenance pursued under the PWDV Act came to be decided by the learned Mahila Court vide order dated 12.05.2022 granting maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month w.e.f. 09.09.2019 that was inclusive of food, rent, clothing, household and other necessary expenses to the complainant from date of filing of petition before the Trial Court till disposal of the case. A perusal of this order would also show that the Court was aware of the factum of maintenance being provided to the respondent in two previous proceedings i.e. under the HMA and Section 125 Cr.PC. In fact, the Court specifies that payment received in any other case shall also be adjusted. Although the respondent had sought alternate accommodation,
