Dismissed

Jatin Pasricha v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Sept 2024W.P.(CRL)/2881/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner questioned fairness of police investigation. Court held petitioner received questionnaire replies opportunity and directed impartial investigation continuation with liberty to furnish documents within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

The IO shall continue impartial investigation and afford opportunity for further documents or explanation within two weeks.

Jatin Pasricha Vs Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2881/2024 & CRL.M.A. 28113/2024, CRL.M.A. 28114/2024

¶4

JATIN PASRICHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal, Ms. Vaishali Shukla and Mr. Prakhar Mittal, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) with SI Naveen Kumar, PS SJ Enclave, ND

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 18.09.2024

¶10

The present petition has been filed doubting the fair, impartial and unbiased investigation continuing to be conducted by the police authorities upon a complaint lodged against the petitioner by respondent no.3.

¶11

Ms. Rao, learned ASC fairly states that the opportunity to submit reply to the questionnaire etc. has already been afforded by the IO to the petitioner. It is also given to understand that the petitioner has given a detailed reply to the 21 questions put to the petitioner by the IO in pursuance of the preliminary investigations being carried out in respect of the complaint lodged by respondent no.3, who is the brother of the petitioner.

¶12

Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court directs that the IO shall

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:50:15

¶14

continue to conduct a fair, impartial and unbiased investigation into the complaint and afford opportunity, if required, to the petitioner to tender further documents or further clarification / explanation in response to the complaint. The petitioner shall be at liberty to furnish any such documents or information as aforesaid within next two weeks.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶16

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶17

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶18

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 ms

¶19

Jatin Pasricha v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatin Pasricha v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musheer Khan & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Shri Sachin Sirohi & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sunil Kothiwal Vs the Commissioner Exicise Ent and Luxury Tax Department

Minor S Thr Her Mother a Vs State & Anr.

Sh. Bali Ram Sharma & Anr. Vs the State , Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Hari Datt Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Manoj Jain and Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

Tarun Miglani Vs the State & Anr.

Minor S Thr Her Mother a Vs State & Anr.

Yashoda Organic Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bharat Bhushan Gera

Ajit Dhanda Proprietor Vs M/S Cl Educate Ltd.

Surender Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ritik Chauhan & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mohd Shahzad Vs Anjuman