The petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called for hearing and did not seek an adjournment. The court found that the petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 12.11.2024
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take passover or an adjournment when the matter was called.
It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter further. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2024 gs/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:16:20
Vijay Kumar Agarwal
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
