The petition filed under Article 226 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for habeas corpus was dismissed on the grounds of withdrawal by the petitioner during the hearing conducted by the High Court of Delhi.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
Through: Mr. Khagesh Kumar, Adv. versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal & Mr. Abinav Kumar Arya, Advs. Insp. Pramod Kumar, SI Prashant Malik, PS Mayur Vihar.
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 09.09.2024
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
AMIT SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024/ Rahul/bh/pr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:47:44
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant permission for withdrawal of the habeas corpus petition.
Whether to dismiss the petition upon withdrawal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Farzana
State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Prathiba M. Singh
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
