Petitioner sought review of unaddressed representation regarding representation by Competent Authority. Court directed State to decide within six weeks and disposed of the petition with pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SURJEET @ BACCHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Nageshwar Kumar, Advs.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (Crl.) for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. SI Dharmendra, PS Pahar Ganj.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
OCTOBER 4, 2024 akc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:32:00
Surjeet @ Baccha
State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
