Shubham Singh v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order of dismissal in default. The petitioner failed to appear or appoint counsel. This order is not substantive and provides no legal proposition.
Order of dismissal in default. The petitioner failed to appear or appoint counsel. This order is not substantive and provides no legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
SHUBHAM SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr.Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate with Insp.Sandeep Shrivastava
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
DECEMBER 3, 2024
na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 13:04:40
Shubham Singh
State of NCT Delhi
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court