Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 read with Section 528 BNSS for production of his sister. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to approach appropriate court.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AKSHAY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yogesh, Mr. Kunal Narwal, Ms. Jyoti and Ms. Nidhi Dalal, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (criminal) for the State with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:32
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
AMIT SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 /sn/pr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:32
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Akshay
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Prathiba M. Singh
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
