Writ petition dismissed as the petitioner did not appear for several dates; pending applications also dismissed for non-prosecution.
None granted; petition and pending applications dismissed on account of non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
JANKI @ ANITA .....Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF NCT & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State and SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Nand Nagri.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
None has been appearing for the petitioner for the last several dates. In view of non-appearance of the petitioner, the present petition along with pending application(s) stands dismissed on account of non-appearance and non-prosecution.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
OCTOBER 28, 2024/AR/DG..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:30:56
Janki @ Anita
The State of NCT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
