Allowed

Arjun @ Monu v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC4 Oct 2024W.P.(CRL)/2543/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his furlough/parole application. The High Court allowed the petition, directing the petitioner's release on furlough for three weeks upon fulfilling specific conditions regarding residence, reporting, and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on 1st Spell of furlough for three weeks upon furnishing one surety of Rs. 10,000/- and complying with stipulated reporting and conduct conditions.

Arjun @ Monu Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2543/2024 ARJUN @ MONU .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Ms.Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 04.10.2024

¶9

By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 11.07.2024 passed by the Office of the Director General of Prisons, Tihar, New Delhi whereby his representation for releasing him on furlough/emergency parole was declined.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has remained incarcerated for a period of about 13 years and 9 months and needs to re-establish social ties.

¶11

Learned ASC (Crl.) for the State has, however, opposed the present petition by contending that the petitioner was earlier released on parole for a period of 30 days with effect from 22.07.2020 to 20.08.2020 which was extended on account of HPC Guidelines issued during the COVID-19 outbreak. The petitioner while being on parole was found to be involved in another case being FIR No.37/2021 registered under Section 307/34 IPC at

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:58:28

¶13

P.S. Sadar Bazar, Delhi. Further, while opposing the present petition, he has referred to Sub-Rule (III) of Rule 1210 of the Delhi Prisons Rules, 2018. He, however, on instructions, states that the petitioner’s address already stands verified.

¶14

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been released on bail in the aforesaid FIR and while referring to Rule 1223 states that no adverse remark has been made in the nominal roll against the petitioner in the last three years.

¶15

A copy of the Nominal Roll has been placed on record, a reading of which shows that no adverse remark has been noted against the petitioner and his jail conduct is also reported to be satisfactory. 6. Considering the aforesaid, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on his 1^st Spell of furlough for a period of three weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing one surety of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:

¶16

i) During the period the petitioner remains out on furlough, he will remain at his residence and shall report to the SHO of the concerned police station on every Saturday at 12:00 PM.

¶17

ii) The petitioner shall also provide to the concerned SHO with mobile number which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the SHO concerned. The mobile location be kept on at all times.

¶18

iii) The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:58:28

¶21

complainant/victim or any member of the complainant/victim’s family or tamper with the evidence of the case.

¶22

iv) The petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of furlough.

¶23

The petition is disposed of in terms of the above.

¶24

A copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

¶25

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶26

OCTOBER 4, 2024/ rd

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2024 at 15:58:28

Arjun @ Monu v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun @ Monu v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramaasre @ Deepak Vs the State & Anr.

Ms. Monika Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Pankaj Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh Darshan Kumar @Bhallu Vs State of Govt of NCT of Delhi through SHO

Rakesh@Diwan Vs State of (Gnct of Delhi)

Roshan Begum Vs State N.C.T of Delhi

Nafees Ahmad and Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mr. Sarvesh Singh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh Darshan Kumar @Bhallu Vs State of Govt of NCT of Delhi through SHO

Himanshu@Sagar@Baba Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Prem Chand Vs Nisha

Mahender Pal Chauhan & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Promila Chhabra Vs Manish Malhotra