The petitioner challenged orders directing the removal of case property. Since the petitioner had already moved the Trial Court for the release of articles, the Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to raise contentions before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
SARFARAZ ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Dubey, Ms. Shublaxmi Dubey, Dr. Sonia Dubey, Ms. Taniya Kapoor, Mr. Ayesha Sarif and Ms. Sofiya Gulati, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State with SI Chetan, P.S. Swaroop Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
% 27.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 08:45:17
the Trial Court.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 ga
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 08:45:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained when the petitioner has already approached the Trial Court for the release of articles pending consideration.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarfaraz Ali
The State & Ors.
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
