Dismissed

Smt.Ranjeeta Arora & Anr. v. Sh. Pankaj Arora

Delhi HC6 May 2024CRL.M.C./2373/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a withdrawn petition under Section 482 CrPC and Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an observation regarding conditional summoning. The court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue pending proceedings in the Execution Court and disposed of the matter accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Leave was granted to pursue proceedings pending before the concerned Execution Court.

Smt.Ranjeeta Arora & Anr. Vs Sh. Pankaj Arora — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2373/2024 & CRL.M.A. 9120/2024 (Exemption)

¶4

SMT.RANJEETA ARORA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Duggal, Advocate (through VC).

¶5

versus

¶6

SH. PANKAJ ARORA ..... Respondent Through:

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 06.05.2024

¶10

The present petition under Section 482 of the CrPC read with Article 227 of Constitution of India seeks following prayers:-

¶11

“In view, of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the present petition under section 482 CRPC read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, it is graciously prayed that this Hon'ble Court may please: I. To call the Trial Court record (TCR);

¶12

II. To set aside the impugned observation/ order dated 08.12.2023 in the matter titled "Pankaj Arora Vs. Ranjeeta Virk Arora" passed by Ms. Neha Paliwal Sharma, ASJ-05 (W) Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, in appeal/ CA no. 108/2021 u/s 29 of PWDC Act, 2005 wherein it has been wrongly observed that by not complying with the summoning conditional order dated 06.10.2021 the respondent will not get any direct benefit; and also

¶13

III. To direct the respondent to comply with the conditional summoning order/ direction dated 06.10.2021 thereof of Sh. Dharmesh Sharma, Principal District and Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, in the same appeal no. 108/2021 u/s 29 of PWDC Act, 2005 before the appeal is to be adjudicated;

¶14

IV. Pass any other appropriate order, or direction with this Hon'ble court may deem fit for the proper according to the circumstances and facts in favor of the petitioner and against the respondents in the interest of justice.”

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:39:54

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue his proceedings pending before the concerned Execution Court.

¶17

Leave and liberty granted.

¶18

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶20

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶21

MAY 06, 2024 /sn

¶22

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:39:54

Smt.Ranjeeta Arora & Anr. v. Sh. Pankaj Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Ranjeeta Arora & Anr. v. Sh. Pankaj Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarun Kumar Nawaria & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Arjun Vs State

Sonia Rishi Vs the State & Anr.

Mohd Khalid Vs Om Prakash

Shri Praveen Kumar Vs Smt. Manisha & Anr.

Mohd Latif Khan Vs State of NCT of Delhi