Petitioner, in custody, sought parole. The State's counsel stated his parole application would be decided within two weeks; the court declined to pass orders and disposed of the petition with liberty to approach again if grievance remained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~93
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
CRL.M.A. 2140/2024 (for exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 234/2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 23, 2024 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/06/2024 at 12:27:33
Sushil Kumar @ Panditji
State
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
