State challenged an Additional Sessions Judge's bail order. The High Court noted 35 of 45 witnesses were examined and no bail violations occurred. Since the trial was near its end, the court disposed of the matter without further proceedings.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to State to approach Competent Court for bail violation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~92
Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State.
versus
UMESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Satendra Singh and Mr. Chirag Verma, Advocates with Respondent in person. Insp. Arjun Singh, PS Krishna Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 19.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:31:54
Complainant has not challenged the Order dated 22.01.2020.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:31:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain the State's challenge to the bail grant order considering the trial is nearing completion.
State of NCT of Delhi
Umesh Kumar
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
