Appellant sought permission under Section 482 CrPC to withdraw his criminal appeal with liberty to approach the trial Court. The application was allowed and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Prasad, Spl. PP with Ms.Ruchika Prasad, Mr. Ayodhya Prasad, Ms. Chanya Jaitly, Advocates for State with Inspector Sandeep, SIT Spl Cell and ACP V.N. Jha, Spl Cell.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 06.09.2024
CRL.M.A. 27018/2024
CRL.A.223/2022
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024/ uk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:13:48
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Meeran Haider
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Suresh Kumar Kait
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
