Dismissed
Ranjeet and Ors. v. State and Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./2224/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners did not appear for the Delhi High Court hearing, including on a prior occasion. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~38
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 2224/2022 & CRL.M.A. 9400/2022
¶4
RANJEET AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Mr. Shiv Chopra (Through V.C.), Ms. Surbhi Arora & Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2-in-Person. SI Nisha (P.S. Mohan Garden) & SI Rachna (P.S. AHTU/South-West).
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
¶8
O R D E R % 04.11.2024
¶9
- None appears for the petitioner.
¶10
- None had appeared for the petitioner on an earlier occasion
¶11
- as well, that is, on 31.07.2024.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ranjeet and Ors
- respondent
State
- respondent
Anr
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court