Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of FIR 0611/2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC after the spouses reconciled and resumed cohabitation. With the wife's consent and no objection from the State, the court quashed the FIR and proceedings as an abuse of process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
ANAND KUMAR & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar Mandal and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Tomar, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) REPRESENT THROUGH S.H.O. NIHAL VIHAR, DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar. R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
% J U D G M E N T
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 7773/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 2003/2024
Page 1 of 3
CRL.M.C. 2003/2024
Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also
Page 2 of 3
CRL.M.C. 2003/2024
stand disposed of.
A copy of this order be forwarded to the learned Trial Court for information.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
MARCH 12, 2024 /akc
Page 3 of 3
CRL.M.C. 2003/2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR 0611/2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC should be quashed given amicable settlement between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar (second petitioner)
The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) represented through SHO Nihal Vihar, Delhi
Respondent No. 2 (wife of petitioner No. 1)
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
