Petition filed by Shashank Lakhotia against ICICI Bank; counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~81
SHASHANK LAKHOTIA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shivam Dahiya , Advocate.
versus ICICI BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Sreeparna Basak, Ms. Swati Bhardwajand Ms. Aditi, Advocates for ICICI Bank. Mr. Raghav Sharma and Mr. Jaskirat Pal Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
%
O R D E R 19.11.2024
Mr. Shivam Dhaiya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner prayed for leave to withdraw the instant petition.
Leave is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024 rk/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:21:08
Shashank Lakhotia
ICICI Bank
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
