Petitioners sought police assistance; in view of an earlier order dated 23.08.2022, counsel stated the petition was rendered infructuous. The court disposed of the petition along with pending applications as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
SONALI BARMAN AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Tripti Juyal, Mr. Gulshan Mishra and Mr. Dipak Raj Singh, Advocates
versus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 01.04.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
APRIL 1, 2024/kks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2024 at 16:02:51
Sonali Barman and Anr.
Commissioner of Police
Ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
