Dismissed
Mrs Ruhi Alia v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./1839/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner was absent on two consecutive hearing dates; the petition and pending applications were dismissed for default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~21
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 1839/2024, CRL.M.A. 7025/2024, CRL.M.A. 7026/2024
¶4
- MRS RUHI ALIA .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: None.
¶6
versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 16.07.2024
¶8
- No one present on behalf of the petitioner.
¶9
- Even on the last date of hearing, the petitioner remained unrepresented. Petition is dismissed in default alongwith pending applications.
¶10
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
¶11
JULY 16, 2024
¶12
ga
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
MRS RUHI ALIA
- respondent
STATE & ANR.
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court