The court held that petitions ldr wherein the petitioner has since expired are infructuous and disposed thereof in that direction.
Petitions stood disposed on the grounds that they became infructuous as the petitioner had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23 & 24
.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anindita Mitra, Advocate (through VC)
versus
DUNI CHAND GARG (PROPRIETOR OF M/S SARTHAK INDIA) (THROUGH LRS) & ORS.
.....Respondents
DUNI CHAND GARG (PROPRIETOR OF M/S SARTHAK INDIA) (THROUGH LRS)
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 21.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:21:15
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
NOVEMBER 21, 2024/ ssc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:21:15
VINAY MANSUKH LAL PANCHMIYA
DUNI CHAND GARG
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
