Petitioner sought cancellation of respondent no.2's anticipatory bail, alleging violation of bail conditions and a subsequent FIR. The court noted no further incident since January 2021 and declined to cancel bail, leaving liberty to take legal steps on any future breach.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
RINKU KUMARI ..... Petitioner
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DLEHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Kamal Chaudhary, PS Prem Nagar. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 06.03.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:21:38
since January 2021.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
MARCH 6, 2024 /akc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:21:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to respondent no.2 should be cancelled for alleged violation of bail conditions.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rinku Kumari
The State of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
