Nitesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous petition seeking to set aside orders closing defence evidence. Court directed witnesses to be examined in one opportunity within 10 days and adjourned final arguments, while imposing costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed with directions for witnesses examination in one opportunity within 10 days; Trial Court to adjourn final arguments to 12.01.2024.
What the court decided
$~54
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 171/2024 NITESH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitish Ojha, Advocate.
- versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with S.I. Kavita, P.S.: S J Enclave.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
- % 08.01.2024
CRL.M.A. 694/2024 (exemption)
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
- Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 171/2024 & CRL.M.A. 693/2024 (Stay)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to set aside impugned orders closing defence due to mental trauma.
Whether witnesses can be examined in a single opportunity within 10 days.
Whether the Trial Court should adjourn final arguments for final arguments.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nitesh
- respondent
State
Coram
Swarana Kanta Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court