In a criminal appeal against the quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC, the appellant requested withdrawal of the appeal following a settlement between parties. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
POOJA SHARMA .....Appellant
Through: Mr.Sudeep Sudan, Advocate with appellant in person. Mr.Roshan Lal Saini, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Respondent no.2 in person. SI Anjali Rathi, DIU/C, PS Paharganj
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 16.12.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the settlement having been arrived at between the parties and the fact that FIR FIR no.67 dated 05.03.3008 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Pahar Ganj has already been quashed in CRL.M.C. 9833/2024 today, he does not want to continue with the present appeal and he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024 Rb/ht
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/01/2025 at 12:33:31
POOJA SHARMA
THE STATE
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
