Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of FIR involving forgery and impersonation allegations, limited to one petitioner. Court held it was not a fit case for quashing, rejected the petition, and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR & ORS
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ravinder Tyagi, Mr. Sumit Kumar and Mr. Bhanu Nandwani, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 09.08.2024
CRL.M.C. 155/2020 (under Section 482 CrPC filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 173/2014)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:33:20
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 9, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:33:20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 173/2014 alleging forgery and impersonation should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC qua the petitioner.
7 provisions across 2 enactments
MANOJ KUMAR & ORS
STATE OF DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
