Quashed

Shri Yoginder Krishan Malhotra & Anr. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Jan 2024CRL.M.C./1546/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No.66/2015 registered for death/bodily injury arising from a construction site accident. The court allowed the quashing as the parties settled their disputes, and petitioners agreed to pay legal costs towards POCSO victim support.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.66/2015 and consequent proceedings, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- by each petitioner to DLSA for POCSO victim support.

Shri Yoginder Krishan Malhotra & Anr. Vs State & Anr. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1546/2023

¶4

SHRI YOGINDER KRISHAN MALHOTRA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Suresh Chand Singhal, Advocate with petitioners in person

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents

¶7

Through: Mr.Naval Kishore Jha, APP for State with ASI Rajinder SI Raghuveer, PS Naraina with respondent No.2 in person

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶10

% 08.01.2024

¶11

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.66/2015 registered under Sections 288/336/337 IPC at P.S. Naraina, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. After completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed under Sections 288/338 IPC.

¶12

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the present case was registered on the complaint of respondent No. 2/complainant. The present FIR relates to an incident which occurred on 05.10.2013 around 10:00 AM when petitioner No.2 (being supervisor of petitioner No.1) invited respondent No.2 to see the under-construction building and due to the absence of any railing/warning as well as negligent work, respondent No.2 fell from a height and sustained injuries.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:25:36

¶15

Learned APP for the State, submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the only complainant/victim.

¶16

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 25.02.2023 and in terms of the same , respondent No. 2 is now left with no claim whatsoever against the present petitioners.

¶17

The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in the Court , have been identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer.

¶18

Respondent No. 2 states that he has entered into the aforesaid Compromise Deed out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶20

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

¶21

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- by each petitioner to be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DLSA) within a period of two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the DLSA for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such assistance.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:25:37

¶24

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the Investigating Officer as well as in Court.

¶25

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.

¶26

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, DLSA for information.

¶27

The Registry shall list the matter before this Court in case receipt of costs to be paid by the petitioners is not filed within the stipulated time period.

¶28

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶29

JANUARY 8, 2024 na

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:25:37

Shri Yoginder Krishan Malhotra & Anr. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Yoginder Krishan Malhotra & Anr. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surjeet @ Baccha Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Prateek Jain & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vijay Chaurasiya and Ors. Vs Preeti Chaurasiya

Ashish Joshi Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Balwant Kumar Maurya Vs Sadhna Maurya

Shri Nitin Kumar Alias Nitin Kumar Bhandari & Ors. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.