The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners had not appeared in the second call and appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter further.
Dismissal of the petition and pending applications due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
PRINCE KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: None
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Priyam Agrawal, Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, Advocates and SI Sumit Tomar, P.S. Budh Vihar Ms. Swati Rathi, Ms. Chetishtha Malik and Mr. Munendar Mann, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 08.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:33:42
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MAY 8, 2024/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:33:42
Prince Kumar and ors.
State of NCT of Delhi and ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
