38. Not only there are contradictions in the testimony of PW2 when compared with her statement Ex.PW21 A, the contradictions also exist in the testimony of PW2 and PW3. While PW3 deposed that her grandfather had made obscene gestures against her in the presence of PW2, after calling them at the second floor of the house at Sangam Vihar, PW2 deposed that her grandfather did not commit any sexual assault/molestation against her at Sangam Vihar. PW2 did not depose about the obscene gestures allegedly made by the accused against PW3, though PW3 claimed that PW2 also was with her at that time. In fact, there is no reference about this conduct of the accused either in the complaint Ex.PWl! A or in any of the four statements of child Victims recorded U/Sec. 164 Cr.P.C. PW3, for the first time in the Court, disclosed that when they had shifted to the house at Sangam Vihar, she and her sister 'M' (PW2) went to the second floor of the house for preparing tea for their aunt. The accused was present there, and he by using his thumb and index finger made a ring type shape and inserted index finger of his other hand in that ring type shape, suggesting sexual intercourse. The accused also made gestures by
