Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal writ petition to amend and refile. Counsel for the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh, and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
GOPI NISHA MALLAH
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajneesh Bhaskar Advocate, DHCLSC with Mr. Rachit Raushan Advocate.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, Ld. ASC for the State with WSI Nidhi Dahiya, P.s. Bara Hindu Rao.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 01.08.2024 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the present petition on the ground that the petition needs some amendment, with liberty to file a fresh.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 1, 2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:49:54
Gopi Nisha Mallah
State (NCT of Delhi)
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
