Sajid Moorad Fazalbhoy v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi Anr. & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Two writ petitions seeking leave to withdraw were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's own request; exemption applications allowed.
Two writ petitions seeking leave to withdraw were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's own request; exemption applications allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74 and 75
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ANR & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus & Mr Arjun Singh Kadian, Advocates. S.I. Pinki Rana, P.S.: Maidan Garhi, Delhi.
versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus & Mr Arjun Singh Kadian, Advocates. S.I. Pinki Rana, P.S.: Maidan Garhi, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 12.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:50:42
CRL.M.A. 1100/2024 & CRL.M.A. 1111/2024 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 130/2024 & W.P.(CRL) 133/2024
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 12, 2024/ at
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:50:42
Sajid Moorad Fazalbhoy
State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Geeta Fazalbhoy
State of NCT Delhi & Anr
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court