The petitioner's counsel indicated he did not wish to press the petition at this juncture and sought liberty to raise contentions before the competent court later.
Liberty granted to raise contentions before the competent court at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
ARUP SINHA ROY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Avtar Singh, Mr. Syed Kishwer, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State. SI Mohit Kumar (D-6288), PS CR Park
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
AUGUST 5, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:47:31
Arup Sinha Roy
The State(NCT of Delhi)
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
