The High Court of Delhi disposed of a criminal petition as infructuous upon the representation by the petitioner's counsel, dismissing all pending applications without substantive adjudication.
The petition and pending applications were disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
SUMESH GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate.
versus
AMIT GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 21.08.2024
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the present Petition has become infructuous.
Statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is taken on record.
The Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
AUGUST 21, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:34:46
Sumesh Gupta
Amit Gupta
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
