Wife's complaint under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC against husband was sought to be quashed after the parties settled all marital disputes, paid the agreed settlement amounts, and their marriage was dissolved by mutual consent. The court found the settlement voluntary and quashed the FIR and all proceedings emanating from it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
Through: Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Adv. with petitioners.
versus
GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing counsel for State and IO/SI Sunil, PS Tilak Nagar.
Mr. Tajinder Singh, Adv. with R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 06.08.2024
CRL.M.A. 11342/2024
W.P.(CRL) 1176/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:38:40
said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately since 13.08.2017 and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR.
5. We have also agreed that we will not initiate any litigation or will not raise any claim in future against each other and the family members and relatives of each other.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:38:40
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:38:40
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J AUGUST 6, 2024/AR/DG..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:38:40
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 680/2018 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC should be quashed given the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
B.S. Joshi v. State of HaryanaRelied on¶8
(2003) 4 SCC 675 · Who else cites this
K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. DeepaRelied on¶8
(2013) 5 SCC 226 · Who else cites this
Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and AnotherRelied on¶8
2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179 · Who else cites this
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Gurpreet Singh
Gurpreet Singh And Anr - Petitioner No. 2 (unnamed)
GNCT of Delhi
Respondent No.3/Complainant (wife)
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
