Petitioners withdrew their writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The writ petition was dismissed accordingly.
Present petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Raghav and Mr. Syed Saif Ali Jafri, Advocates
versus STATE (NCT OFDELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr. Priyam Aggarwal, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R % 09.04.2024
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
APRIL 9, 2024/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:12:50
Pramod Kumar and Ors.
State (NCT of Delhi)
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
