Quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for a matrimonial FIR; complainant stated reciprocal settlement obligations unfulfilled and opposed quashing; petitioners withdrew the petition with liberty to file afresh after full compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
Through: Mr. Kamal Jindal, Advocate along with all the petitioners in person.
versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Rahul Bisht, PS: Jagatpuri. Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
CRL.M.A. 4568/2024 (Exemption)
CRL.M.C. 1154/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:41:51
110051 upto the ceiling area, however, either the same has not been executed or has not been placed on record. There is also no averment in the petition that any such Gift Deed has been executed. Additionally, the Complainant, who is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer SI Rahul Bisht, PS: Jagatpuri, states that in terms of the settlement between the parties, Petitioners were required to fulfil certain reciprocal obligations, which have not been fulfilled so far and therefore, she has reservations to the quashing of the FIR at this stage.
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024
B.S. Rohella
CRL.M.C. 1154/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:41:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC could be quashed in view of the settlement between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajeev Jain & Ors.
State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
Respondent No.2 (Complainant)
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
