Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition as the underlying complaint case before the trial court had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
..... Petitioner
versus
MAYAWANTI @ MAYA DEVI
..... Respondent
Through: None.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition since the complaint case before the learned Trial Court is stated to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.
None for the respondent.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2024
‘dc’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/02/2024 at 11:28:01
Ram Kishan
Mayawanti @ Maya Devi
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
