Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of parole. The court directed the Competent Authority to dispose of the pending parole application within three weeks.
Direction to the Competent Authority to dispose of the pending parole application within three weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
HARI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates with Insp. Robin Tyagi, PS: Crime Branch.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 24.04.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
APRIL 24, 2024/shivam/kks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:07:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant parole to a convicted person for 60 days after the filing of a parole application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Hari Singh
State (NCT of Delhi)
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
