Dismissed

State (Nct of Delhi) v. Vikrant Birla @ Kaatu

Delhi HC19 Mar 2024CRL.A./1041/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal under Section 377 Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement of sentence in a murder case, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal. The court held enhancement was impermissible as the respondent had already received the maximum sentence. Alongside, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed due to lack of plausible reasons. Appeal dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal under Section 377 Cr.P.C. and application for condonation of delay dismissed.

State (Nct of Delhi) Vs Vikrant Birla @ Kaatu — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision: 19^th March, 2024

¶4

- CRL.A. 1041/2023 & CRL.M.A.34142/2023

¶5

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant

¶6

Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Naresh Kumar, PS Baba Haridas Nagar.

¶7

versus

¶8

VIKRANT BIRLA @ KAATU ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Mr. Prakash Airan and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶11

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶12

CRL.A. 1041/2023 & CRL.M.A.34142/2023 (for condonation of delay)

¶13

Present petition has been filed by the appellant/State seeking following prayer:-

¶14

“a) Pass an order for the Trial Court record arising out of FIR No.469/14, U/s 302/34/147/148/149/34 IPC, P.S Baba Haridas Nagar; and/or

¶15

b) Allow the present appeal to enhance the sentence of the accused persons/respondents and sentence them for life imprisonment/death penalty and set aside the impugned judgment dated 28.10.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Court of Sh. Pitamber Dutt, Ld. Addl. Session Judge (South West), Dwarka Court Delhi and order dated 9.03.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Court of Sh. Vishal Gogne Ld. Addl. Session Judge (South West), Dwarka Courts Delhi arising out of from FIR no. 469/2014 PS: Baba Haridas Nagar U/s 302/147/148/149/324/34 of

¶16

CRL.A. 1041/2023

¶17

Page 1 of 3

¶18

Signature Not Verified

¶19

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 0.03.2024 15:16:22

¶20

IPC; and/or

¶21

c) To further liable the accused/ respondents for conviction as per law under section 302/34/149 of Indian Penal Code.”

¶22

Present appeal has been filed by the State under 377(1) Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement of sentence passed in the impugned judgment dated 28.10.2021, passed by learned ASJ (South West), Dwarka Courts, Delhi.

¶23

The trial had taken place against nine accused in FIR No.469/2014 PS Baba Haridas Nagar for the offences punishable under Section 302/324/147/148/149/34 IPC. One of the accused namely Preeti, had absconded. Out of the remaining eight accused, two accused namely Rahul and Sandeep @ Sarkar have been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and the eight accused (who are respondents herein) had been, instead, convicted for offence punishable under Sections 147, 148 IPC and under Section 324 read with Section 149 IPC.

¶24

It is not in dispute that all the respondents in the present appeal have been awarded maximum sentence. Learned APP has very fairly conceded to the same. In such a situation prayer for enhancement in sentence is totally misconcerned. There is also no appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. challenging acquittal under Section 302 IPC. Since maximum sentence has already been granted to the respondents, enhancement in sentence would be against the statute, being impermissible.

¶25

CRL.A. 1041/2023

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 0.03.2024 15:16:22

¶29

We also find no plausible reason to condone the delay which is of 763 days.

¶30

In view of the above, the present appeal and the application for condonation of delay are hereby dismissed.

¶31

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)

¶32

JUDGE

¶33

(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE

¶34

MARCH 19, 2024/st

¶35

CRL.A. 1041/2023

¶36

Page 3 of 3

¶37

Signature Not Verified

¶38

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 0.03.2024 15:16:22

State (Nct of Delhi) v. Vikrant Birla @ Kaatu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State (Nct of Delhi) v. Vikrant Birla @ Kaatu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Shiv Kumar Paswan Vs State of NCT of Delhi through Dcp South, Delhi Police

Smt. Chandani Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

State Vs Rohit

Gopal Singh Bist Vs Union of India & Anr.

Seema through Adv Sumayya Khatoon Vs Gnctd and Others

State Vs Vikas Kumar & Anr.