I have considered the arguments. As far as the first two grounds are concerned, the fact that the applicant/A-3 has chosen to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against orders dated 24.01.24 of Hon‟ble Delhi High Court and order dated 19.01.24 passed by this court dismissing his anticipatory bail application, this court cannot grant any relief from appearance and the applicant/A-3 has to approach the Hon‟ble Superior Courts, for seeking exemption. As regards appearance through V/c is concerned, it needs to be reemphasized that the applicant/A-3 is not on bail in this case and his anticipatory bail application also stands dismissed. The court had already made it clear on the previous date that the applicant/A-3 had to appear physically, which he has repeatedly failed to do so. As regards the contention that NBWs cannot be issued at the first instance after dismissal of exemption application is concerned, it is pertinent to mention that the exemption application of applicant/A-3 already stands dismissed on the previous date and no new fact is brought on record, to allow the present application. Moreover, the court had not issued NBWs on the previous date despite dismissal of his exemption application and granted him time to appear but he chose not to do so .
