The Single Judge held the present contempt petition unsustainable as the respondent had addressed and decided the petitioner's grievances via an email and minutes copy, rendering the matter decided on merits. The court declined to examine disputed factual questions and the petition was dismissed without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
DR ATUL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanwarpal Singh and Ms. Ananya Parashar, Advs.
versus
MR. VINAI KUMAR SAXENA, CHAIRMAN, DDA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Birbal & Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for DDA Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Mr. Vedansh Vashisht, Ms. Harshita Nathrani & Mr. Arjun Gupta, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
“3. From the pleadings and the annexures appended to the writ petition, we find that the Petitioner has made complaints dated 05.07.2016 and 28.07.2016 which are still pending. We
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:PRAMODCONT. CAS(C) 969/2022 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:06.08.2024 16:01:31
Page 1 of 3
accordingly, direct the concerned Respondent(s) to treat this writ petition as a representation and look into the grievances ventilated by the Petitioner, in the present writ petition as well as the complaints aforementioned and take a decision thereon in accordance with law, rules regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case, as expeditiously as possible. 4. Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions, granting liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to remedies available to the Petitioner, in an appropriate Forum in accordance with law, in case of any surviving/further grievance. 5. Pending application is also disposed of.”
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:PRAMODCONT. CAS(C) 969/2022 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:06.08.2024 16:01:31
Page 2 of 3
raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the present contempt proceedings.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 05, 2024
Sadiq
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:PRAMODCONT. CAS(C) 969/2022 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:06.08.2024 16:01:31
Page 3 of 3
Dr Atul Gupta
Mr. Vinai Kumar Saxena, Chairman, DDA & Anr.
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
