Dismissed

Jitender & Anr. v. Ms. Navneet Mann & Anr.

Delhi HC16 May 2024CONT.CAS(C)/733/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner approached this Court seeking fresh directions to remove ongoing unauthorized construction on their land. The Court noted that previous demolition efforts had partially succeeded and advised the petitioner to file separate action against new construction rather than seeking fresh directions in this proceeding.

What did the court decide?

None granted. Petitioner advised to file fresh action for ongoing construction.

Jitender & Anr. Vs Ms. Navneet Mann & Anr. — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~110

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 733/2024

¶4

JITENDER & ANR. .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. V.P. Rana, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

MS. NAVNEET MANN & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhir and Mr. Shivam Takiar, Advocates

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶9

O R D E R % 21.11.2024 CM APPL. 67917/2024

¶10

This is a disposed of matter.

¶11

Petitioners now seek fresh direction to DDA as according to them, there is continuous unauthorized construction. When asked, Mr. Rana, learned counsel for applicants/petitioners submitted that earlier some unauthorized construction had been carried out on the property of the petitioners and in terms of last order passed by this Court on 16.05.2024, there was a direction that Special Task Force (STF) under the Chairmanship of Vice Chairman, DDA would take expeditious steps for the purposes of removal of unauthorized construction. The police was also asked to give requisite assistance to STF. It was also directed that such action be, preferably, carried out within a period of four months and the contempt

¶12

CONT.CAS(C) 733/2024 1

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:19:42

¶14

petition was accordingly disposed of.

¶15

Now the present application has been moved.

¶16

However, if one goes through the contents of the above-said application, it would become clear that the grievance of the petitioners suggest accrual of fresh cause of action. In Paragraph-5, it has been mentioned that there is some ongoing construction and co-sharers i.e. Mr. Naveen, Mr. Pradeep and Mr. Deepak are still raising construction on the subject land. It has, therefore, been prayed in the application under disposal that fresh directions be issued to DDA on account of continuing unauthorized construction.

¶17

It does not seem to be a case where the demolition had not taken place. Even the photographs placed on record by the petitioners themselves would indicate that there was a demolition as some debris can still be seen lying in the area.

¶18

Therefore, instead of moving the present application, if petitioners if so advised, can always file action against the fresh ongoing construction.

¶19

Application is accordingly dismissed.

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

NOVEMBER 21, 2024/ dr

¶22

CONT.CAS(C) 733/2024 2

¶23

Jitender & Anr. v. Ms. Navneet Mann & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitender & Anr. v. Ms. Navneet Mann & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Burlington Luxury Brands Private Limited and Ors. Vs Genesis Finance Company Ltd. and Anr.

Smt. Paramjit Kaur Vs Mr. Kamal Yadav & Ors.

Parveen Kumar Vs Kapil Goyal & Ors.

Parveen Kumar Vs Kapil Goyal & Ors.

Surender Kumar Vs Garima Gupta

Richa Bhutani Vs Manish Bhutani

Mayank Singhee Vs R C Mishra

Mohd Parvez Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Burlington Luxury Brands Private Limited and Ors. Vs Genesis Finance Company Ltd. and Anr.

Sh. Inderjeet Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Shri Subhash Vs Delhi Development Authority DDA & Ors.

Inderjit Mehta Constructions Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Sh Amarjit Mehta Vs Major General Hari Singh

Gurmeet Kaur Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mohan Lal Vs Shri Gyanesh Bharti and Ors.