In this contempt application, the petitioner did not appear to argue the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-appearance and non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
SNEHLATA SETHI .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
HIMANSHU SABHARWAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Lochan , Adv. for R-1 to R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 02.09.2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/ VLD
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:21:12
SNEHLATA SETHI
HIMANSHU SABHARWAL & ORS
DHARMESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
