Writ petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior direction to pass a speaking order. Petitioner submitted that a speaking order had been passed by the respondent, rendering the petition infructuous. Court disposed of the petition as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~108
DIVYANSHU VANWANI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya Singh with Mr. Shubham Singh and Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocates. (M): 9205737259
versus
S. KISHOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Syed Haseeb, CGSC with Mr. Hilal Haider, GP and Ms. Butul Khan, Advocates. (M): 9811962385
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 24.04.2024
CM APPL. 23401/2024 (for exemption)
CONT.CAS(C) 644/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 14:04:15
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
petition has now become infructuous, since a speaking order dated 04 April, 2024 has been passed by the respondent. He further submits that the petitioner shall avail his remedies as per law to challenge the said speaking order dated 04th April, 2024.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
APRIL 24, 2024 c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 14:04:15
Divyanshu Vanwani
S. Kishor
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
