Dismissed

Vibhuti Aggarwal v. Vishal Chaddha

Delhi HC16 Aug 2024CONT.CAS(C)/628/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addressed a contempt petition filed for the respondent's alleged wilful disobedience of maintenance directions. The Court held that not every breach necessitates contempt action and the Family Court can ensure compliance. The petitioner successfully withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the Family Court.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue remedies before the concerned Principal Judge, Family Court.

Vibhuti Aggarwal Vs Vishal Chaddha — Maintenance and Alimony | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~13

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 628/2024

¶4

VIBHUTI AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Vashishtha with Ms.Harshita Rai, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

VISHAL CHADDHA .....Respondent

¶7

Through: None.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 16.08.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 42425/2024 in CONT.CAS(C) 628/2024

¶12

The petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent/husband for the wilful disobedience of the directions passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, New Delhi District dated 07.12.2023, whereby he was directed to make the payment of Rs.75,000/- per month w.e.f. the date of filing of the petition towards ad interim maintenance of the child. 2. None is present for the respondent despite sending advance notice.

¶13

This Court is of the firm opinion that every breach of the directions/orders passed by the learned Family Court Judge, does not invite initiation of action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court is competent enough to ensure compliance of its order/directions, including issuance of coercive measures.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2024 at 15:10:55

¶15

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner requests permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue remedies before the concerned Principal Judge, Family Court. It is directed accordingly. This is without prejudice.

¶16

The date already fixed stands cancelled.

¶17

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶18

AUGUST 16, 2024/ VLD

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2024 at 15:10:55

Vibhuti Aggarwal v. Vishal Chaddha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vibhuti Aggarwal v. Vishal Chaddha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh Dinesh Kumar Madan Vs Mr Dinesh Kumar Gondiyan Registrar & Anr.

Dtwelve Spaces Private Limited and Anr. Vs Ms R Ganapathy Janaki & Ors.

Arshad Hussain Vs Prof Eqbal Hussain the Officiating Vice Chancellor & Ors.

Niraj Kumar Vs Rajiv Gauba & Ors.

Shalini Thakur Vs Shashank Thakur

Kanta Prasad Gautam Vs Shanti Alias Sarita

Jasveer Singh (Deceased) through Lrs Vs Dinkar Gupta

Suman Dahiya Vs Chander Prakash Dhaiya

Sh Dinesh Kumar Madan Vs Mr Dinesh Kumar Gondiyan Registrar & Anr.

Dtwelve Spaces Private Limited and Anr. Vs Ms R Ganapathy Janaki & Ors.

Niraj Kumar Vs Rajiv Gauba & Ors.

Rajeev Gandhi Jan Sewa Samiti through Its President Sh. Ravi Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority through Its Vice Chairman

Vijay R Haror Vs Sanjay Jaju

M/S Abul Kalam Azad Islamic Awakening Centre Vs Khadija Hospital Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.