The petitioner submitted that reinstatement had already been granted, rendering no further adjudication necessary. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition and pending applications.
Disposal of the petition and pending applications as nothing left for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
MAHESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advocates.
versus
MAJ GEN RAVINDRA CAHTURVEDI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R
% 12.01.2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has already been reinstated by the department, nothing is left for further adjudication in the matter and the matter may be disposed of.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents have no
objection for the same.
In view of the above submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the instant petition is disposed of as nothing is left for further adjudication in the matter.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
JANUARY 12, 2024 rk/ds Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:15:40
Mahesh Kumar
Maj Gen Ravindra Caturvedi & Ors
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
