The Court held that no compliance was achieved regarding the refund of excess stamp duty. The respondent was directed to ensure compliance within four weeks and file an affidavit before the next hearing.
Respondent directed to ensure compliance within 4 weeks and file compliance affidavit; officer to appear if no compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
ASHISH LUTHRA
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kartik Dabas, Ms. Priyanka Sachdeva and Mr. Yugansh Sharma, Advocates.
versus
SHRI NARESH KUMAR AND ANR .....Respondents
Through: Mr Abhimav Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R
% 19.05.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:43:46
ANISH DAYAL, J
MAY 19, 2025/sm/ bp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:43:46
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the previous order directing refund of excess stamp duty.
Whether the respondent has nominated a representative to ensure future compliance.
Ashish Luthra
Shri Narash Kumar and ANR
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
