Petitioner in a contempt petition stated the main contemnor had expired. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition or decision on merits was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
PROMOSHIRT SM S.A. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
versus
DINESH KAUSHAL & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JANUARY 12, 2024/kr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:55:29
PROMOSHIRT SM S.A.
DINESH KAUSHAL & ANR
MINI PUSHKARNA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
