Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a Division Bench judgment in W.P.(C) No. 11034/2018. Counsel for petitioners stated compliance had been made and did not press the petition; the court disposed of it as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~89
ASI/PHARMA BISWA PRAKASH JENA AND ORS..... Petitioners
Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate.
versus
SH SUJOY LAL THAOSEN AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Ms. Mishika Pandita, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 22.05.2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
MAY 22, 2024 c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:30:08
ASI/Pharma Biswa Prakash Jena and Ors
Sh Sujoy Lal Thaosen and Ors
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
