“2. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that previously, two Writ Petitions, being W.P.(C) 3791/2000 as well as W.P.(C) 14175/2005 were preferred, mainly for the purposes that goshalas and/or gosadans may be maintained properly by the respondents. Care was to be taken of stray cattle, and a policy was to be evolved by the respondents so that stray cattle may not go on the road and cause accidents. Counsel for the petitioner has taken this Court to Annexure B to the memo of this petition and the orders passed in these Writ Petitions, more particularly the order dated 10th November, 2005. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has also submitted that in the present Writ Petition, not only difficulties faced by goshalas and gosadans are highlighted, but they have also highlighted the difficulties created by monkeys, as stated in the Writ Petition and it is submitted that the respondents should have some policy to take care of these monkeys at monkey shelters. Same is the case with stray dogs. Several suggestions have also been made by counsel for the petitioner about sterilization programmes for birth control etc., and for providing anti rabies vaccination to Government Hospitals.
